← Tom Nash

If I Started Investing in 2026, This is What I'd Do (My Exact Plan)

2026-07-15

·

12m

·

10 min read

·

·

Start in 2026 by building the base first: 6-12 months of cash, no expensive debt, max out 401(k)s and IRAs, then DCA only half of new investable cash into stocks while keeping the other half in treasuries or a money market as dry powder. Put 50% of the portfolio in the S&P 500 and the rest in no more than 10 individual stocks chosen for management, margins, revenue growth, debt, and cash; buy more when a holding or index is 20%+ below its 1-year high and revert when it recovers. Avoid leverage and margin, because brokers can force sales; buy only businesses meant to be held 5, 10, 15 years, not trades. The argument against waiting is blunt: sitting in cash is riskier over 20 years, with cash projected to lose 45% of purchasing power, the S&P 500 projected to 5x, and missing the top 10 market days over 20 years cutting returns in half.

  • A 2026 starter should wait a couple of weeks before buying any stock and first get the foundation right, using past experience from 6 years in stocks like PLTR.
  • Emergency cash should cover 6-12 months because a job loss plus a 2022-style dip can force stock sales at 40 cents on the dollar just to pay rent.
  • Expensive debt should be eliminated before investing a single dollar, because its cost wipes out investing gains.
  • Tax-advantaged accounts should be maxed first, including 401(k)s and IRAs or the equivalent in the investor’s country, framed as government "free money."
  • If $1,000 a month is available, only 50% — $500 — should go into stocks and the other 50% should stay in reserve.
  • That $500 monthly stock buy should continue every month regardless of market direction: DCA.
  • The reserve should sit in treasuries or a money market account earning minimal interest.
  • If a stock or index falls 20%+ from its highest point in the past year, the monthly buy should be increased from reserve cash, such as $500 plus $500 plus $500 for a $1,500 month instead of $500.
  • When the name is no longer 20% down — e.g. 79 turning to 81, 82, or 83 after a $100 high — the plan should revert to the normal $500 monthly buy.
  • The point of buying more on declines and less on rallies is to push cost basis toward the bottom over years without timing the market.
  • Timing the market is called stupid, gambling, and a no-win game; DCA plus dip-buying only works if the business is good and will not save a horrible stock.
  • The portfolio should hold companies meant to be owned for 5, 10, or 15 years, not trades meant to create a salary or "insane money" quickly.
  • Trading against daily pros is framed as losing because they have more money, information, resources, and experience; buy-and-hold removes that edge if the companies are good.
  • The maximum number of individual stocks should be 10, because more than that is unrealistic to track properly.
  • Half of the portfolio should be in the S&P 500 via a broad ETF tied to the US economy, described as "literally undefeated."
  • The claim is that research shows the S&P 500 is impossible to beat over 10, 15, or 20 years and should average about 10% per year over those horizons.
  • The other half should go into up to 10 individual stocks selected by management quality, margins, revenue growth, debt, and cash.
  • The academy at tradingnut.com/tom nash is presented as a place to learn stock evaluation and decide independently, and it does not give stock picks.
  • Buy/sell alerts are called a scam because the goal is to teach investing skills so people can decide for themselves.
  • Leverage should be avoided: borrowing from a brokerage gives the broker control, can trigger a margin call, and can force a sale after a drop even if the investor wants to hold.
  • Portfolio risk should fit age: at 25 with 40-50 years ahead, risk can be much higher; at 55, the stance should be more careful and more cautious.
  • Older investors wanting upside still need to protect assets with more bonds and slightly less tech and AI exposure.
  • People saying 2026 is a bad time to start because the market is expensive are rejected; sitting on the sideline is described as more expensive than investing.
  • Over the next 20 years, cash is projected to lose 45% of purchasing power, with inflation taking money to 50 cents on the dollar.
  • Holding the S&P 500 for 20 years with no stock picks is projected to 5x money.
  • Missing the top 10 days in the stock market over the past 20 years is said to cut returns in half.